American Economic Sanctions on 90 Years 20 Century: Difficult Way to Reform of Sanction Politics

Abstract

The September 11th, terrorist attacks on the United States totally
overshadowed the significant legislative changes in the field of the US
sanctions policy, which went into effect in the years 2000 and 2001. Albeit
these changes as such may appear insufficient at first sight, the decade of
sanctions policy reform debates and disputes which preceded these
changes justifies the conclusion that they are the best result possible, and
far more important than any unsystematic shifts in the regime of imposing
economic sanctions for foreign policy purposes made back in the 1990s.
The need to reform the US sanctions policy was caused by a fundamental
change of the international environment brought about by the end of the
Cold War. Unlike in the bipolar world, wherein universal sanctions measures
were fully sufficient, it was necessary after the end of the Cold War to react
to numerous and varied threats to US foreign policy interests. This was
done by laws “tailored” for the sanctioned country. The attempt to reform
US sanctions policy in the 1990s revealed in full the rivalry between the
legislative and executive powers, both of which wanted to preserve the
decisive influence upon administrating sanctions and making decisions
about them. It was undoubtedly the legislative power –the Congress –
which emerged strengthened from the decade of rivalry.The last major
factor reemerging in the sanctions policy reform debate and disputes was
the issue of extraterritorial effects of some US laws. The extraterritoriality of
US legislation caused a backlash in the world, which the US administration
could not simply ignore. Yet the United States will probably not give up this
powerful tool for forced multilateralization of its unilateral sanctions since
this tool enables the US to avoid protracted and uncertain promotion of its
interests in the form of multilateral sanctions negotiated by traditional
diplomatic means