Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

On the Forms of Vulnerability and Ungrievability in the Pandemic

Abstract

This contribution reviews and comments on recent scholarship on the
politics of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on how vulnerability was
constructed and studied. We reflect on the various meanings of
vulnerability and suggest political science should go beyond individualized
and identity-based approaches and see the pandemic conditions as shared
and embedded within the already existing social, political, and economic
structures. We also examine how our previously identified discursive frames
of science and security work in the context of the later pandemic stages
and the vaccination rollout and note how these frames continue to render
certain lives ungrievable. Our contribution is intended to add to the
growing interest in using the concepts of vulnerability, precariousness, and
precarity in studies of politics and international relations, as well as in
critical studies of public health and the coronavirus pandemic.

Keywords

COVID-19, vulnerability, precarity, grievability, pandemic politics

PDF Forum Contribution

Author Biography

Pavol Hardoš

Pavol Hardoš (1982) is an assistant professor at the Institute of European
Studies and International Relations, the Faculty of Social and Economic
Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava. He obtained his PhD in political
theory at the Central European University in Budapest. With teaching
commitments and interests in political philosophy, democratic theory, and
theories of social science, his research focuses on the intersections of the
epistemic aspects of politics, ideological discourse, and populism.

Zuzana Maďarová

Zuzana Maďarová (1984) is a researcher at the Institute of European Studies
and International Relations, the Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences,
Comenius University in Bratislava. Her research focuses on the gender
aspects of political subjectivity, feminist approaches in political sciences, gender perspectives in political communication, and the neo-conservative
turn in political discourse.