Nabucco Swept Away by South Stream: Was the Securitization of the Russian Pipeline Successful?
Abstract
This article aims to determine if the European Commission was successful
in the securitization of the Russian South Stream pipeline. The Commission
tried to convince the participating Member States to abandon the South
Stream project in favor of the competing Nabucco pipeline. The discursive
analysis showed that all the participating countries accepted the security of
supplies as a referent object. Nevertheless, they did not accept certain
measures advocated by the Commission, i.e. a supranational approach to
energy security and amendments of the intergovernmental agreements
concluded with Russia. Instead, the participating Member States were using
their alternative discourses in order to resist this securitization. The
European Commission was able to stop the South Stream project only
through a direct, non-discursive intervention against Bulgaria, which, after
the start of the infringement procedure, suspended its participation in the
project. The other participating countries accepted this intervention, yet
they did not support it.
Keywords
EU, Nabucco, South Stream, energy security, securitization
Author Biography
Nikita Odintsov
Nikita Odintsov is an associate researcher at the Institute of International Relations, Prague. His research focuses on energy security in the EU and the former Soviet
Union